LLM Serving Optimisation Tools and Techniques

You do not solve the LLM trade-off triangle with one tool.
You solve it by stacking the right ones.
Here are the five layers that actually move the needle:
- ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น
Use quantisation before deployment to shrink weights and reduce bandwidth pressure.
In the right setup, this can cut infrastructure needs dramatically without hurting quality.
- ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐น๐
vLLM helps you use hardware properly with continuous batching, PagedAttention, and prefix caching.
That means better throughput and less wasted memory.
- ๐ฆ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด
Speculative decoding pairs a fast draft path with a larger target model.
The result: faster token generation on repetitive, high-context tasks.
- ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐น๐
GuideLLM lets you test real LLM traffic patterns and measure TTFT, ITL, and throughput.
If you do not measure it, you will overbuy hardware.
- ๐ฆ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ
llm-d separates the compute-heavy prompt phase from the memory-bound generation phase.
That lets each part scale on the hardware it actually needs.
The pattern is simple:
- compress first
- serve efficiently
- accelerate decoding
- test under load
- separate the phases
That is how you get major cost reduction without sacrificing model quality.
If you are building LLM infrastructure, which layer are you optimising first?
Originally published on LinkedIn.
Turn your expertise into LinkedIn posts like this one.
Try Postars free โ